Comments on: Prosecutor: Signature forgery decision within 30 days

By: henri

henri — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:29:14 +0000

The prosecutor might want to look at the signature of Jon’s from the fire marshall report, as shown on Swampbubble’s. It could hold some clues!

http://swampbubbles.com/20100208/jon-busy-or-he-trying-avoid-fire-marshal

And what happens when you blow off a follow-up inspection?

What about holding another meeting prior to resolving the issues listed?
Jon held a meeting on January 9 in the same upstairs location that the Fire Marshall initially said that his people had to be present for any gathering to continue back on December 21, 2009.

Maybe LisaRenee is able to get some answers to this…

By: mindy

mindy — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:59:09 +0000

Thanks, Henrietta,

I tried to tell him that comment wasn’t mine, I am guessing it was yours. Making a reference such as that is not something I sould say. Again, its not even clever.

For the record…MegKelJo is mine and I have made this reference to the original intendees. When the term was originated, there was no malfeaence intended.

I’m not snarky all the time.

Be well.

By: henri

henri — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:23:24 +0000

Mindy and Rogue-

One will have to wonder, which of the two is Sadie Mae, and which one is Squeaky Fromme when it comes to Jon’s two consorts…

By: kateb

kateb — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:09:57 +0000

I am not surprised it’s taking so long – I predicted that it would. This is a political hot potato for those who will be handling the prosecution(s).

The Blade has such a warm place in its stony heart for this fellow that everyone involved knows there will be a backlash in the publication if anyone holds Stainbrook accountable. For anything, really.

Happily the locals have both quit their subscriptions or are now reading the publication with a critical eye.

My opinion only..

By: henri

henri — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:47:54 +0000

I just can’t wait for all of the little staniacs other issues to come home to roost!

Game on, little jon.

By: mindy

mindy — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:40:20 +0000

OK, Rogue,

Gotta ask…

If indeedy this is a “slam-dunk” What the heck is taking sooo long. I would think this would be rather cut and dried, yes or no, black or white, right or wrong…you get the idea.

MegKelJo? (I love it when my verbage comes home!)

Happy Saturday!

By: rogue

rogue — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:39:00 +0000

Well, my sources say this is a slam dunk. And, that the prosecutor is going out of his way to tie up ALL loose ends.

One wonders how long MegKelJo can keep the proverbial finger in the proverbial dike.

Cheers…

By: Sujay

Sujay — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:46:11 +0000

Yes, and at least it wasn’t an advertorial.

By: LisaRenee

LisaRenee — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:33:58 +0000

The TFP should do what every other media source does that makes an omission on an online story, just change it without a word of correction. At least they got the name right.

By: LisaRenee

LisaRenee — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:30:58 +0000

Okay Sujay, the mere difference in not adding “assistant” clearly to you means the same as a vote that did not take place as far as the level of what’s right and what’s wrong.

You did not just not include one word, you were wrong about it completely. But, if it makes you feel better to go off topic to make one word an issue as opposed to commenting on the story? I’m happy for you.