<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-mail from Senator Sherrod Brown on the health care reform legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:25:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-346167</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-346167</guid>
		<description>It does not matter what type of health
care we are on, whoever administers
it has the mentality to always look
for some reason to deny 
procedures or payment.
Oh, yes, one is able to appeal, but
with the wait one can always be dead
before for a decision of an appeal.

Administrators of health care coverage
always looks for a way out and It has always been that way and will always
be that way.

Now they will be searching, looking and implementing new ways to
deny coverage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does not matter what type of health<br />
care we are on, whoever administers<br />
it has the mentality to always look<br />
for some reason to deny<br />
procedures or payment.<br />
Oh, yes, one is able to appeal, but<br />
with the wait one can always be dead<br />
before for a decision of an appeal.</p>
<p>Administrators of health care coverage<br />
always looks for a way out and It has always been that way and will always<br />
be that way.</p>
<p>Now they will be searching, looking and implementing new ways to<br />
deny coverage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Again</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-346159</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-346159</guid>
		<description>According to a Gallup survey released Wednesday morning, 48 percent of registered voters questioned answered that they would vote for the Republican candidate if the 2010 election for the House was held today, while 44 percent said they would back the Democrat in the race.

Hmmm, seems like folks are getting more and more disgusted with the current administration; I wonder why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a Gallup survey released Wednesday morning, 48 percent of registered voters questioned answered that they would vote for the Republican candidate if the 2010 election for the House was held today, while 44 percent said they would back the Democrat in the race.</p>
<p>Hmmm, seems like folks are getting more and more disgusted with the current administration; I wonder why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-346106</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-346106</guid>
		<description>Sue, I asked Marcy Kaptur&#039;s office that very question.  I was told the congresswoman has that option.  Right, she has the cadillac of health plans paid for at the tax payer expense.  It should be law they are covered by whatever debacle we face.  Since they voted for it, it should be mandated they are covered by it.  If it&#039;s not good enough for them, it&#039;s not good enough for me.  Just like how they give themselves raises.  We, the people should vote on that.  In fact, why don&#039;t our representatives just work full time in the district they serve.  Why do they all have to work in DC.  It&#039;s far too easy to be influenced by special interest and corruption while inside the beltway.  If they work full-time in their own district they are here for their constituents.  With technology they don&#039;t have to all work in DC.  Our system of government has to change.  It&#039;s far too corrupt and caters to special interest instead of the citizens.  

This house bill is plain and simply, UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  The government can not make me buy something or force me to pay for healthcare for someone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue, I asked Marcy Kaptur&#8217;s office that very question.  I was told the congresswoman has that option.  Right, she has the cadillac of health plans paid for at the tax payer expense.  It should be law they are covered by whatever debacle we face.  Since they voted for it, it should be mandated they are covered by it.  If it&#8217;s not good enough for them, it&#8217;s not good enough for me.  Just like how they give themselves raises.  We, the people should vote on that.  In fact, why don&#8217;t our representatives just work full time in the district they serve.  Why do they all have to work in DC.  It&#8217;s far too easy to be influenced by special interest and corruption while inside the beltway.  If they work full-time in their own district they are here for their constituents.  With technology they don&#8217;t have to all work in DC.  Our system of government has to change.  It&#8217;s far too corrupt and caters to special interest instead of the citizens.  </p>
<p>This house bill is plain and simply, UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  The government can not make me buy something or force me to pay for healthcare for someone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-346045</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-346045</guid>
		<description>Sue,
Don&#039;t forget Unions are exempt from this too. Granted I didn&#039;t see it in the newest version but the newest version isn&#039;t any smaller so I figure they just added to it and did not take much away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue,<br />
Don&#8217;t forget Unions are exempt from this too. Granted I didn&#8217;t see it in the newest version but the newest version isn&#8217;t any smaller so I figure they just added to it and did not take much away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-346006</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-346006</guid>
		<description>If this Health Care bill is to be so
great why doesn&#039;t Obama &amp; his family,
those in the House and Senate go
on the same plan all of us are to be
on??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this Health Care bill is to be so<br />
great why doesn&#8217;t Obama &amp; his family,<br />
those in the House and Senate go<br />
on the same plan all of us are to be<br />
on??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaRenee</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-346002</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaRenee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-346002</guid>
		<description>I saw that, which goes along with what I&#039;ve stated, the country is divided, though I don&#039;t see the 54% you are referencing, it states the most recent results as: 

 Thirty-eight percent now say they would advise their member of Congress to vote against a new healthcare bill this year, while 29% would advise their member to vote for it, and about a third have no opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that, which goes along with what I&#8217;ve stated, the country is divided, though I don&#8217;t see the 54% you are referencing, it states the most recent results as: </p>
<p> Thirty-eight percent now say they would advise their member of Congress to vote against a new healthcare bill this year, while 29% would advise their member to vote for it, and about a third have no opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Again</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-346000</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-346000</guid>
		<description>I just saw a Gallup poll on the dobbs program, that would be CNN, that said only 29% of Americans now support the current public health care program being pushed by the house.

There is clearly no mandate for this government take over of 1/6 of our economy.  Here is a Gallup poll that I found that shows 54% of the people don&#039;t support the take over.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/124202/No-Clear-Mandate-Americans-Healthcare-Reform.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw a Gallup poll on the dobbs program, that would be CNN, that said only 29% of Americans now support the current public health care program being pushed by the house.</p>
<p>There is clearly no mandate for this government take over of 1/6 of our economy.  Here is a Gallup poll that I found that shows 54% of the people don&#8217;t support the take over.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/124202/No-Clear-Mandate-Americans-Healthcare-Reform.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.gallup.com/poll/124202/No-Clear-Mandate-Americans-Healthcare-Reform.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaRenee</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-345971</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaRenee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-345971</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough, that same statistic of 87 on the dollar being spent directly on patient&#039;s medical costs has been used as an argument against &lt;a href=&quot;http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/would-tort-reform-lower-health-care-costs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tort reform&lt;/a&gt;.  

I am aware of how much an MRI costs, I&#039;m also aware that hospitals charge those who do not have insurance a higher dollar amount than those who do, since most insurance companies negotiate a lower price.  Logic dictates if everyone had insurance, they would qualify for the lower prices, which some could still argue for certain procedures are higher than they should be.  

It&#039;s also not agreed upon that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goozad.com/news/Senator+demands+Cigna+clarify+premiums,+claims_58299&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;premiums&lt;/a&gt; are paid out by that percentage as well as what this health care plan will do.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;According to the Senate analysis, the six largest public insurance companies&#039; average ratio in 2009 was 74 percent for individuals; 80 percent for small companies with fewer than 50 employees, and 84 percent for large businesses.

America&#039;s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the industry association, disputed the finding.

&quot;Government data show that 87 cents of every premium dollar go directly to pay for medical care,&quot; AHIP spokesman Robert Zirkelbach said in an email statement.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough, that same statistic of 87 on the dollar being spent directly on patient&#8217;s medical costs has been used as an argument against <a href="http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/would-tort-reform-lower-health-care-costs/" rel="nofollow">tort reform</a>.  </p>
<p>I am aware of how much an MRI costs, I&#8217;m also aware that hospitals charge those who do not have insurance a higher dollar amount than those who do, since most insurance companies negotiate a lower price.  Logic dictates if everyone had insurance, they would qualify for the lower prices, which some could still argue for certain procedures are higher than they should be.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also not agreed upon that the <a href="http://www.goozad.com/news/Senator+demands+Cigna+clarify+premiums,+claims_58299" rel="nofollow">premiums</a> are paid out by that percentage as well as what this health care plan will do.  </p>
<blockquote><p>According to the Senate analysis, the six largest public insurance companies&#8217; average ratio in 2009 was 74 percent for individuals; 80 percent for small companies with fewer than 50 employees, and 84 percent for large businesses.</p>
<p>America&#8217;s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the industry association, disputed the finding.</p>
<p>&#8220;Government data show that 87 cents of every premium dollar go directly to pay for medical care,&#8221; AHIP spokesman Robert Zirkelbach said in an email statement.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voice of Reason</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-345968</link>
		<dc:creator>Voice of Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-345968</guid>
		<description>The government is trying to attack the approx 13% administration costs of healthcare that private insurance companies represent while pretty much ignoring the 87% portion that represents the costs of health services.

The house bill will continue to shield consumers of healthcare services from the true costs of health care.  Who among you know how much it costs for an MRI, EKG, Office Visit, heart surgery, etc.?  You&#039;ve never cared about the cost have you?  That&#039;s the problem.

Additionally, more than 50% of medical claims are a result of bad personal choices - eating too much, no exercise, smoking, drinking too much, sedintary lifestyle.  

The government cannot and will not inject any level of personal responsibility into this solution.  Their bill will force people into some level of insurance while doing nothing to educate them on responsible utilization.  

Sherrod Brown and his type want to cap private insurance premiums while removing limitiations on claims and enrollment.  When your personal expenses rise dramatically and your income remains flat, what happens to your financial situation?  You go belly up! The same would happen to insurance companies.

As I stated above, 87% of the private insurance costs go directly to paying for patient&#039;s medical service claims.  Adding people to the insured ranks while capping premiums and adding benefits will not do anything reduce the costs of services.  The house bill completely misses the target, which leads me to believe that they are not really aiming for a solution.  They are building a dependency on the Democrat party, plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government is trying to attack the approx 13% administration costs of healthcare that private insurance companies represent while pretty much ignoring the 87% portion that represents the costs of health services.</p>
<p>The house bill will continue to shield consumers of healthcare services from the true costs of health care.  Who among you know how much it costs for an MRI, EKG, Office Visit, heart surgery, etc.?  You&#8217;ve never cared about the cost have you?  That&#8217;s the problem.</p>
<p>Additionally, more than 50% of medical claims are a result of bad personal choices &#8211; eating too much, no exercise, smoking, drinking too much, sedintary lifestyle.  </p>
<p>The government cannot and will not inject any level of personal responsibility into this solution.  Their bill will force people into some level of insurance while doing nothing to educate them on responsible utilization.  </p>
<p>Sherrod Brown and his type want to cap private insurance premiums while removing limitiations on claims and enrollment.  When your personal expenses rise dramatically and your income remains flat, what happens to your financial situation?  You go belly up! The same would happen to insurance companies.</p>
<p>As I stated above, 87% of the private insurance costs go directly to paying for patient&#8217;s medical service claims.  Adding people to the insured ranks while capping premiums and adding benefits will not do anything reduce the costs of services.  The house bill completely misses the target, which leads me to believe that they are not really aiming for a solution.  They are building a dependency on the Democrat party, plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/2009/11/e-mail-from-senator-sherrod-brown-on-the-health-care-reform-legislation/#comment-345943</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasscityjungle.com/wordpress/?p=10593#comment-345943</guid>
		<description>Yes but they are trying to overhaul too much in my opinion. They are trying to control every possible outcome with this plan and THAT is what is impossible. That is why it will fail if it gets passed. No one can control everything. The more control the less freedom. I like freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes but they are trying to overhaul too much in my opinion. They are trying to control every possible outcome with this plan and THAT is what is impossible. That is why it will fail if it gets passed. No one can control everything. The more control the less freedom. I like freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

