Glass City Jungle

Moody sends out release after appearance on Andrew Z segment

29 Jan 2009

This in via e-mail from the Moody for Mayor campaign:

Last Night, Jim Moody, along with Keith Wilkowski, spoke on Channel 36. The topic was the Lucas County Commissioner’s intent to pass a resolution asking the Ohio Legislature to pass a bill postponing all foreclosures for 6 months.

The format only allowed a 3 minute discussion, which Jim Moody felt was an inadequate time to discuss such an important issue. Following is an elaboration of Jim Moody’s position.

Foreclosures Are Unfortunate

Jim stated that he felt bad for the families that face foreclosure. For more than 2 years his company has helped people find alternatives to foreclosure. Those alternatives included soliciting help from Toledo’s Fair Housing Agencies, working solutions out with lenders and helping families get out from under mortgages that were unsustainable considering the home owner’s circumstances.

The Resolution Is Dangerous.

IT COULD HURT FAMILIES EVEN MORE

1st. It will give troubled families a false sense of security. No state or local government can dictate to federally chartered banks how they will conduct their business. 2nd. Many families only get their news/knowledge from the media.

There is a great risk that families who are facing foreclosure might ‘learn’ that our local government passed a non-binding resolution granting them an extra six months to live in their house. Hearing such, they may be tempted not to take the immediate AND appropriate measures that could solve their problems. Consequently, there is a very real and dangerous risk that these victims would have all their worldly possessions set out on the street exposed to the elements and vandals. Passage of this type of resolution, could in fact, inflict more trauma on these families than they are already experiencing.

IT COULD CHILL BUSINESSES’ DESIRE TO LOCATE INTO TOLEDO

Before any business locates to a community, it does research on the community. Passage of a tepid resolution like this, only further enhances the suspicion a company has about locating into an area where the local government dictates how a company can operate.

A perfect example can be found right here in the Toledo area. Several years ago, the City government debated and passed a resolution dictating how mortgage companies and banks could operate in our area. As a direct result of the City’s actions, more than 30 underwriters left the area and with them more than $30 million dollars of investment capital. Imagine the number of families whose dreams were unrealized as a result of these actions. Imagine the number of jobs that left our region as a result of this resolution. Imagine the amount of urban blight that was perpetuated as a result of this meddling.

All of this damage occurred because politicians wanted to create ‘feel good’ legislation that protected no one.

THIS RESOLUTION IS HURTING OUR AREA

As a direct result of our elected leaders considering this ‘worthless’ resolution, real problems are not being addressed. Instead of addressing the blight our neighborhoods are experiencing, the politicians are debating ‘feel good’ legislation. Instead of finding solutions for families without jobs, these ‘leaders’ are wasting valuable time and resources. Finally, instead of implementing measures that could reduce our taxes, tax payer money is being wasted on measures that will not matter.

Toledo deserves better.

Jim Moody, candidate for Mayor of the City of Toledo, is a local businessman who publishes a magazine, has a real estate company and provides continuing education for adult career advancement.

7 Responses to “Moody sends out release after appearance on Andrew Z segment”

  1. 1
    Martha44 Says:

    Moody is right on…this resolution is nonsense.

    Can you imagine if the government would tell all citizens they didn’t have to pay their all bills for 6 months? Businesses would collaspe. So Wilkowski wants to deprive troubled banks of receiving promised mortgage payments? That will sure help to resolve the financial crisis.

  2. 2
    LisaRenee Says:

    That’s part of the not factual aspect of this argument. No one is suggesting nor have they ever suggested that this would be a way for people to merely stop paying their bills. (I should add, except for those opposed to this.)

    When Massachusetts did this, when Citibank did this, when the government did this, it was never done in a manner that people were given the impression that they could stop paying.

    We went through the same discussion here last year during the utility moratorium, where it was stated people would use this as a way to stop paying their bills. If anyone was stupid enough to do that, their utilities were still shut off, all that changed was some additional protection for those who were actually making an attempt to be fiscally responsible.

    If a moratorium is created by the General Assembly, it will not be a blanket permission for people to merely stop paying their bills. There will be steps and procedures that have to be followed and there will be standards set to demonstrate financial responsibility to be able to avoid foreclosure.

  3. 3
    Pink Slip Says:

    The poor troubled banks….if these poor troubled banks had the assets to back up their risky loans, they wouldn’t be poor and troubled. So as it stands, the poor troubled banks are getting bailed out for their risky behavior. Now I’m not saying those taking out loans aren’t just as guilty. But it makes no sense to bailout one side and not the other.

  4. 4
    LisaRenee Says:

    Part of this discussion could also include the new post on what Representative Kaptur stated on January 15th that is now receiving national media attention. It’s been included as a new post for those interested.

  5. 5
    Martha44 Says:

    Lisa-

    Let’s be serious. The point is banks will have no remedy to prevent people from NOT paying their home mortage. If people don’t pay their bill, banks can’t COLLECT any money for 6 MONTHS…that is a big problem..also unfair to banks (really shareholders).

  6. 6
    LisaRenee Says:

    Martha if we are really going to be serious, there would be no protections in place for those who are in foreclosure who didn’t pay – they’d end up on the streets and to be perfectly serious, once a house is in foreclosure the bank isn’t earning anything on it anyway. Nor are these houses selling…they are sitting vacant…generating no income for the bank…

  7. 7
    Martha44 Says:

    Lisa says,

    “once a house is in foreclosure the bank isn’t earning anything on it anyway.”

    Yep, that justifies it. Stop and think what you are writing. It’s OK to keep and enjoy something that is NOT yours.

    This type of ascine logic by empathetic people often hurts the people they want to help. If you aren’t going to allow banks to reposess homes, they will tighten their lending—-and the poor will have a harder time ever getting into a house. Heck will economics and common sense.

© 2012 Glass City Jungle | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)
Design inspired by Design Your Web Page - Powered By Blog Collector

Switch to our mobile site