Another case related to Karyn McConnell-Hancock?
14 Dec 2007
In addition to the news on the criminal charges for filing a false police report and the earlier summary in the Blade which sums up some of the local television coverage, it’s been learned that an additional lawsuit involving Karyn McConnell-Hancock is expected to be reported on later today on WTVG.
I’ve also heard from several sources that a visiting judge will be assigned to this case.
Links will follow to this latest case as soon as they are online.
Some of the recent links to this story:
Fox Toledo Attorney Charged in Bogus Kidnapping.
WTVG Karyn McConnell-Hancock case.
NBC24 Police release attorney’s 9-1-1 call.
WTOL McConnell-Hancock picks up citation and summons to court.
There you go, scooping the media again.
December 14th, 2007 at 2:57 pmThis is more of a media promo, since I heard the story will be coming and I don’t know all of the details but I know many of you are following the story and would be interested.
Our local media has been really fantastic in supporting this blog, which I appreciate very much.
December 14th, 2007 at 3:19 pmSo how long is WTVG gonna make us wait?
December 14th, 2007 at 6:13 pmWell, we learned that her whole client list is being turned over to the prosecutors office and there is a question about an escrow account. Which appears to be a new escrow account from the way it was reported. They probably have to wait for the case file and/or legal to clear airing more details.
And…we saw Alan Konop talk about the charges and the visiting judge aspect.
December 14th, 2007 at 6:47 pmWow! This is about as “Epic” as Toledo gets.
December 14th, 2007 at 7:56 pmI must have fallen asleep. I completely missed the part about the client list. I laughed when Konop emphasized the word perceived.
December 14th, 2007 at 8:44 pmI thought that was just me noticing that emphasis…
December 14th, 2007 at 8:48 pmYou know what they say about great minds….
Did you also pick up on the twinkle in his eye?
December 14th, 2007 at 9:43 pmIs Boy Ben’s daddy representing her?
December 14th, 2007 at 9:46 pmNo, she’s being represented by Jerome Phillips – but WTOL uses Alan Konop often when they want to ask a lawyer questions on air.
December 14th, 2007 at 9:49 pmThey also use Phillips, but his current client kinda rules that out.
December 14th, 2007 at 9:54 pmWas Roberta de Boer talking about us in her blog? US — the most level-headed group of comment-leavers that ever lived?
http://carin4karyn.blogspot.com/2007/12/frankly-roberta-you-should-give-damn.html
December 15th, 2007 at 2:55 pmHer comments were indicative of how out of touch with reality she really is.
December 15th, 2007 at 2:59 pmel machico, my sympathy is with the victims and the investigators who had to spin their wheels for so many days. I don’t mean I don’t feel sorry the family has been hurt in all this, but I don’t know how Roberta can think “there’s nothing here to see, folks, just move on…” (not a quote, but that’s the sense of what she’s saying).
December 15th, 2007 at 3:15 pmAnonymous- I’m with you on the family part, that I assumed was a given. What I meant was her out of touch sense of reality here in regard to what lies just beneath the surface…
December 15th, 2007 at 4:29 pmDig deeper and find the corrupt sense of good’ole boy mentality that has been present in Toledo for so long.
I won’t focus on KM-H, I am confident she will get what is coming to her from the criminal justice system by way of criminal/civil penalties. To say nothing of the Toledo Bar Association and Supreme Court Disciplinary Committee. I am more concerned with the cover up that occurred/occurring/will occur. It begins with mayor Fink orchestrating a Sat. morning press conference with his chosen ‘Police Chief’. Almost seems like Ms. DeBore is on the payroll urging citizens to “move on”. (Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain)
We’re in agreement all the way, el mahico. Usually we can count on Roberta to see things through a more critical eye. She might just be setting out magnets to attract the big interview.
December 15th, 2007 at 6:09 pmThe link in post 12 doesn’t work. : (
December 17th, 2007 at 2:28 pmIt appears as if that blog has been taken down, so that’s why the link doesn’t work.
December 17th, 2007 at 2:53 pmYes, that blog and two that were linked from it are gone.
December 17th, 2007 at 3:10 pmI’m enjoying the hypocracy of the local media’s anal invasion of Tom Noe, but the antics of Karyn McConnell have slipped into oblivion and what she has allegedly done, in my opinion, is far more heinous than manipulating a billion dollar entity.
I think I want a copy of this playbook.
December 18th, 2007 at 4:34 amWhy has this thread been “cleansed” so to speak? Where is Elsebeth Baumgartner’s explanation of the criminal nature of insurance fraud, and why a judge’s daughter is not being charged criminally? Where are the several follow-up comments? Was political pressure brought to bear to have all these subsequent posts removed? Interesting side note, a Christmas Day Blade editorial on the increasing cases of police brutality used Ms. Baumgartner’s exact phrasing “no place to go” regarding the general subject of prosecutors choosing not to prosecute. So the Blade editors apparently read this blog. But again, where are the missing posts? Moved to someplace else, or removed due to political pressure?
December 26th, 2007 at 12:15 pmI responded to you on the other thread, but for the sake of clarity should someone read this thread, I do not delete comments and the two comments by Ms. Baumgartner are still on the blog.
December 26th, 2007 at 12:32 pmAgain, my apologies (was sure this was the thread in question & still can’t locate the one I was reading/posting on last week). But I take your word for it that you don’t delete posts, based on other threads I’ve seen at this blog. This entire KMH case just frustrates me enormously & I obviously should have investigated further before posting.
December 26th, 2007 at 1:07 pm